Study Finds¶
Attribute |
Value |
|---|---|
Site |
|
RSS |
|
Twitter handle |
|
Location |
Baltimore |
Timezone |
America/New_York |
Country |
|
Language |
|
Bundles |
Analysis¶
As part of its archiving routine, our system conducts routine audits of code quality using Google’s open-source Lighthouse tool. It rates sites against standards for performance, accessibility, search-engine optimization and best practices.
This site was analyzed 15 times over the last seven days. Scores of 90 or greater are considered good. Scores of 50 to 89 are described as needing improvement. Scores below 50 are rated as poor.
The median score for each category, along with how it ranks in comparison to the rest of the archive, is reported below.
| Metric | Score | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | 85 | 686 |
| Best practices | 100 | 1 |
| Performance | 99 | 1 |
| SEO | 97 | 135 |
Artifacts¶
Assets gathered by our system and stored in the Internet Archive
Screenshots¶
The archiving routine has saved 416 screenshots with the Internet Archive.
Here are the 12 most recent screenshots.
Hyperlinks¶
The archiving routine has saved 416 hyperlink lists with the Internet Archive.
Here are the 10 most recent hyperlink lists.
Time |
|---|
Accessibility¶
The archiving routine has saved 412 accessibility trees with the Internet Archive.
Here are the 10 most recent accessibility trees.
Time |
|---|
Lighthouse¶
The archiving routine has saved 416 Lighthouse audits with the Internet Archive.
Here are the 10 most recent Lighthouse audits.
Time |
|---|